Referee whistle
We attempt to include a post on all the major controversies in the 2008 Presidential campaign (and beyond). As part of this website’s theme, we include a “referee whistle” call at the top of each of these posts. We are mainly concerned with determining whether or not someone committed a “foul”, which we define as unfair tactics by the campaigns, the media, or anyone. We assess a “penalty” using the imprecise football analogy, just to roughly estimate the severity of the unfairness. We hope you like our website regardless of your attitude toward football.
Sometimes we include a “referee whistle: silent, no foul” because a controversy has emerged, but we think nothing unfair has occurred.
Campaigns, the media, and everyone have the right (and duty) to raise legitimate criticisms of each other. We are on the lookout for unfair tactics and “dirty” politics. We review and research each controversy and avoid “knee-jerk” reactions.
Please vote in our opinion polls! For each “referee whistle”, we give you a chance to “boo” or “cheer” each call we make at www.electionreferee.com. We encourage you to base your vote more on the “call” (whistle or no whistle) rather than the “penalty” (10 yards, etc.).
We encourage you to post comments too! You can post anonymous comments. Sometimes comments do not appear on the website automatically because we need to guard against spam and totally inappropriate content. We encourage opposing viewpoints, and we will post all comments as soon as possible.
Sphere: Related ContentNo Comments »
No comments submitted yet.
Loading ...